The potential of innovative financial tools: Social Impact Bond (SIB) and Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) sukuk, towards the sustainable growth of the Islamic finance industry


The purpose of this paper is to explicate the congruence of innovative financial tools: Social Impact Bond (SIB) and Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) sukuk with the principles of Islamic Finance, and explore their potential contribution towards the sustainable growth of the Islamic finance and societal wellbeing. Using various literature, the paper takes a comparative approach in explaining and relating the two innovative tools with the development of Islamic finance. The paper finds that there is a growing interest in innovative tools such as SIB and SRI sukuk globally. Furthermore, these tools exemplify the spirit of risk-sharing and social responsibility which are the major essences of Islamic finance that are currently missing in practice. The paper provides a reference towards understanding the mechanism and concepts of SIB and SRI sukuk. It also provides insight to the emerging interest in these innovative tools, and assesses the current innovative efforts in the Islamic finance industry. Additionally, it highlights the potential of these tools towards the sustainable growth of the Islamic finance industry through risk-sharing and societal impact. The paper is exploratory and conceptual in nature therefore further empirical studies can be done.


Social Impact Bonds; SRI sukuk; Risk-sharing; Innovative financial tools; Social responsibility.

Full Text:




IFSB, Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2015. 2015, Islamic Financial Services Board: Malaysia.

MIFC, Islamic Finance Prospects and Challenges. 2015, Malaysia Internation Islamic Financial Centre (MIFC): Malaysia.

Ng, A., A. Mirakhor, and M.H. Ibrahim, Risk Sharing and Social Impact Partnerships, in Social Capital and Risk Sharing: An Islamic Finance Paradigm. 2015, Palgrave Macmillan.

Disley, E., et al., Lessons learned from the planning and early implementation of the Social Impact Bond at HMP Peterborough, M.o. Justice, Editor. 2011, Ministry of Justice. p. 86.

Kohli, J., D. Besharov, and K. Costa, What Are Social Impact Bonds? - An Innovative New Financing Tool for Social Programs. 2012, Center for American Progress: US. p. 11.

Henderson, S., Introduction to Social Impact Bond, S. Finance, Editor. 2014, Social Finance Limited UK. p. 5.

Costa, K., et al., Frequently Asked Questions: Social Impact Bonds. 2012, Center for American Progress. p. 40.

Nicholls, A. and E. Tomkinson, The Peterborough Pilot - Social Impact Bonds. 2013, University of Oxford. p. 50.

Warner, M.E., Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 2013. 16(4): p. 303-319.

Hughes, J. and J. Scherer, Foundations for Social Impact Bonds: How and Why Philantropy Is Catalizing the Development of a New Market, S. Finance, Editor. 2014, Social Finance. p. 56.

Reeder, N., et al., Feasibility Study: Social Financing And New Models For Public-Private Partnerships. 2014, Agensi Inovasi Malaysia, Prime Minister's Department, Government of Malaysia: Malaysia. p. 48.

Callanan, L., J. Law, and L. Mendonca, From Potential to Action: Bringing Social Impact Bonds to the US. 2012, McKinsey & Company. p. 68.

Social Finance, A Technical Guide to Developing Social Impact Bonds. 2011, Social Finance: UK. p. 11.

Shah, S. and K. Costa, Social Finance: A Primer. 2013, Center for American Progress. p. 19.

KPMG, Social Bonds: Business Case for the Ministry of Health (NZ). 2013, KPMG and the Ministry of Health. p. 117.

Liebman, J.B., Social Impact Bonds - A promising new financing model to accelerate social innovation and improve government performance in Center for American Progress Report. 2011. p. 32.

Kleiner, R., Evaluating the Launch of the first Social Impact Bond in Switzerland, in Business Management. 2014, University of St. Gallen: Switzerland. p. 86.

Azemati, H., et al., Social Impact Bonds: Lessons Learned So Far. Community Development Investment Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 2013.

Tomkinson, E., An Australia snapshot - Social Impact Bonds. 2012, The Centre for Social Impact: Australia. p. 16.

Tomkinson, E. Social Impact Bonds and Pay for Success – are they synonyms? 2014 [cited 2014 5th September]; Available from:

Barclay, L. and T. Symons, Introduction to Social Impact Bonds Workshop. 2013, Social Finance.

Ministry of Justice, Peterborough Social Impact Bond, HMP Doncaster. Payment by Results pilots: Final re-conviction results for cohorts 1. 2014, Ministry of Justice: UK.

Finance For Good. Finance for Good Social Impact Bond Tracker. 2016 2016 2 February 2016]; Available from:

Moghul, U.F. and S.H.K. Safar-Aly, Green Sukuk: The Introduction of Islam's Environmental Ethics to Contemporary Islamic Finance. The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 2014. 27(1).

USSIF, Report on: US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends 2014. 2014, The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment United States.

HM Government, Growing the Social Investment Market: A vision and strategy, M.o.C. Society and P. General, Editors. 2011, HM Government: UK. p. 59.

Ministry of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Harnessing THE Power OF SOCIAL FINANCE: Canadians Respond to the National Call for Concepts for Social Finance. 2013, Human Resources ad Skills Development Canada: Canada. p. 31.

World Bank. About World Bank Green Bonds. n.d. [cited 2015 September]; Available from:

Ministry of Finance Malaysia, The 2014 Budget, Ministry of Finance Malaysia, Editor. 2013, Government of Malaysia: Malaysia.

Securities Commission Malaysia, Capital Market Masterplan 2, S.C. Malaysia, Editor. 2011, Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia: Malaysia.

Securities Commission Malaysia, SC Introduces Sustainable and Responsible Investment Sukuk framework. 2014: Malaysia.

Securities Commission Malaysia, Guidelines on Sukuk, S.C. Malaysia, Editor. 2014.

RAM ratings, Credit FAQs: Rating Khazanah's Sukuk Ihsan, S.S. Ming and T.H. Nee, Editors. 2015, RAM Holdings.

Khazanah Nasional, Khazanah to issue first Ringgit-denominated sustainable and responsible investment sukuk 2015, Khazanah nasional: Malaysia.

The Star Online. Khazanah’s RM100m sustainable Sukuk priced at 4.3%. 2015 [cited 2015 4th June 2015]; Available from:

CIMB, Ihsan Sukuk Berhad: Information Memorandum. 2015, CIMB: Malaysia.

Centre for Social Impact Bonds. SIB definition. 2013 19 April 2013 [cited 2015 September 2015]; Available from:

Ronicle, J., et al., Social Impact Bonds: The State of Play. 2014, Big Lottery Fund.

Bennet, M.S. and Z. Iqbal, How socially responsible investing can help bridge the gap between Islamic and conventional financial markets. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2013. 6(3).

Biema, D.V. The Financial Crisis: What Would the Talmud Do? 2008 [cited 2015 8th September]; Available from:,8599,1849231,00.html.

Dusuki, A.W., Corporate Social Responsibility of Islamic Banks in Malaysia: A Synthesis of Islamic and Stakeholders' Perspectives. . 2005, Lougborough University: Lougborough.

ISRA, IRTI, and Durham University, Kuala Lumpur Declaration 2012.

Sheng, A., Islamic Finance as Social Impact Investing. 2013, Fung Global Institute.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

EJIF - European Journal of Islamic Finance has been approved for inclusion in ERIH PLUS and in DOAJ 

Indexed by
EBSCO Discovery Service e Arab World Research Source: Al Masdar

European Research Centre for Islamic Finance 

Registrazione Tribunale di Torino n.: 29
data registrazione: 21.10.2014
ISSN 2421-2172
Direttore responsabile: Paolo Biancone

Università degli Studi di Torino


Licenza Creative Commons

EJIF content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.