Note a margine su natura demoniaca, sessualità e donna in Bhagavadgītā As It Is di A. C. Bhaktivedānta Svāmī Prabhupāda

  • Bryan De Notariis University of Turin
Keywords: Hare Kṛṣṇa, Bhagavadgītā, Swāmī Prabhupāda, Max Weber, ISKCON

Abstract

The article analyses three recurring concepts in the Bhagavadgītā As It Is written by Bhaktivedānta Svāmī Prabhupāda (the founder of the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement): the demoniac nature, the sexuality, and the woman. The research investigates the use and meaning of these three concepts and how they are linked to each other by a basic doctrine of aversion of materiality. The doctrine of Svāmī Prabhupāda will be defined a “Traditional Worldly Asceticism” as a result of a comparison between the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement and the works and ideas of western scholars such as Wilhelm Halbfass and Max Weber.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bryan De Notariis, University of Turin
Bryan De Notariis received his MA in Asian and African Languages and Cultures at the University of Bologna, in Italy. He is currently a Ph.D. student at the University of Turin and his research project concerns the study of the Pāli commentarial literature. He has recently published an article entitled “Osservazioni sull’esposizione della creazione del corpo fatto di mente (manomaya-kāya) all’interno del Sāmaññaphala-sutta” (Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Orientale 54 (2018): 177-204).

References

Fonti primarie

Prabhupāda, A. C. Bhaktivedānta Svāmī. 1972. Bhagavadgītā As It Is. Second Edition Revised and Enlarged, The Bhaktivedānta Book Trust.

Olivelle, Patrick. 2005. Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fonti secondarie

Baird, Robert D. 1986a. “Swami Bhaktivedanta and the Bhagavadgita ‘As it Is’.” In Modern Indian Interpreters of the Bhagavadgita, edited by Robert N. Minor, 200-221. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Baird, Robert D. 1986b. “Swami Bhaktivedanta: Karma, Rebirth and the Personal God.” In Karma and Rebirth: Post Classical Developments, edited by Ronald W. Neufeldt, 277-300. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Baird, Robert D. 1987. “The response of Swami Bhaktivedanta.” In Modern Indian Responses to Religious Pluralism, edited by Harold G. Coward, 105-127. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. 1933. “On Translation: Māyā, Deva, Tapas.” Isis 19/1: 74-91.

Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. 1935. “Angel and Titan: An Essay in Vedic Ontology.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 55/4: 373-419.

Devī Dāsī, Ūrmilā. 1994. According to religious principles: A guide to sexual relations in a Kṛṣṇa conscious marriage. Second Edition, United States of America: ISKCON Education of N.C., Inc.

Hacker, Paul. 1983. “Inklusivismus.” In Inklusivismus. Eine indische Denkform, Herausgegeben von Gerhard Oberhammer, 11-28. Wien: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien.

Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hale, Wash H. 1986. Ásura- in Early Vedic Religion. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Kiblinger, Kristin B. 2003. “Identifying Inclusivism in Buddhist Contexts.” Contemporary Buddhism 4/1: 79-97.

Kiblinger, Kristin B. 2005. Buddhist Inclusivism: Attitudes Towards Religious Others. London and New York: Ashgate Publishing.

Kuiper, Franciscus B. J. 1975. “The Basic Concept of Vedic Religion.” History of Religions 15/2: 107-120.

Matilal, Bimal K. 2002. Ethics and Epics: The Collected Essays of Bimal Krishna Matilal. Edited by Jonardon Ganeri J. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Monier-Williams, Monier. 1899. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

Nicholson, Andrew J. 2010. Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press.

Pelissero, Alberto. 2018. “Alcune riflessioni su Dio e gli dèi nell’Hinduismo: Monoteismo/politeismo, deva/asura e īśvara, non-dualismo e dualismo.” Humanitas 73/1: 130-143.

Rochford, Burke E. 1995. “Family Structure, Commitment, and Involvement in the Hare Krishna Movement.” Sociology of Religion 56/2: 153-175.

Rochford, Burke E. 2000. “Demons, Karmies, and Non-devotees: Culture, Group Boundaries, and the Development of Hare Krishna in North America and Europe.” Social Compass 47/2: 169-186.

Rochford, Burke E. 2007. Hare Krishna Transformed. New York and London: New York University Press.

Satsvarūpa, Gosvāmī. 1980-1984. Śrīla Prabhupāda Līlāmṛta. Vols 1-6. Los Angeles: Bhaktivedānta Book Trust.

Sharpe, Eric J. 1985. The Universal Gītā: Western Images of the Bhagavadgītā, a bicentenary survey. London: Duckworth.

Squarcini, Federico. 1995. “Il Moviemento Hare Kṛṣṇa, Un ramo dell’albero di Śṛī Caitanya.” In Il crocevia dell’identità, Sri Caitanya: una sfida filosofica in anticipo di cinque secoli, a cura di Federico Squarcini, 107-112. Ospedaletto (Pisa): Pacini editore.

Squarcini, Federico. 2000. “In Search of Identity within the Hare Krishna Movement: Memory, Oblivion and Thought Style.” Social Compass 47/2: 253-271.

Squarcini, Federico. 2002. “‘Power of Mysticism’ and ‘Mysticism of Power’: Understanding the Sociopolitical History of a Neo-Hindu Movement.” Social Compass 49/3: 343-364.

Terrin, Aldo N. 1987. Nuove religioni: alla ricerca della terra promessa. Brescia: Morcelliana.

Weber, Max. 1976. “Osservazioni intermedie.” In Max Weber, Sociologia delle religioni, vol. II, a cura di Chiara Sebastiani, introduzione di Franco Ferrarotti, 593-635. Torino: Utet.

Weber, Max. [1991] 2016. L’etica protestante e lo spirito del capitalismo. Introduzione di Giorgio Galli, traduzione di Anna Maria Marietti. Milano: Bur (prima edizione BUR 1991).

Published
2018-11-23
Section
Articles