Original Papers

Science Education Futures. Science Education as if the Whole Earth Mattered.


Abstract


In 1990 a gathering of ecopsychologists took place at the Harvard Centre for Psychology and Social Change to participate in a conference entitled “Psychology as if the Whole Earth Mattered”.  They concluded that “if the self is expanded to include the natural world, behavior leading to destruction of this world will be experienced as self-destruction” (Roszak, Gomes, & Kanner, 1995). I take this idea into the realm of science and science education which I suggest requires a reconfiguration and extension of science into a new inter- and trans-disciplinary realm of sustainability science with implications for renewed pedagogies of science in schools and universities. Such a changing perspective requires greater vision, creativity and imaginative approaches to address the problems currently facing the planet and the future of humanity. This paper provides an overview of a journey in science education over the years covering a range of views around science: starting from what we might consider to be the idea of modern science and how that science has been transformed into “big science” and “techno-science”. Further, in the current era of the Anthropocene (Steffen, Crutzen, & McNeill, 2007) it can be argued that such approaches to science need to be reformed to take account of ideas such as post-normal science (Funtowicz & Ravetz, 1994),  sustainability science (Clark & Dickson, 2003) and holistic science (Bohm, 1980; Goodwin, 1997). Using the concepts of planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2009b) and doughnut economics (Raworth, 2012, 2017) as a framework, consideration is given to what this might mean for science education futures.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/2774

References


Alsop, S. (2005). Bridging the Cartesian Divide: Science Education and Affect. In S. Alsop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian Dualism. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_1.pdf

Amrine, F. (1998). The Metamorphosis of the Scientist. In D. Seamon & A. Zajonc (Eds.), Goethe’s Way of Science (pp. 33–54). New York: The State University of New York.

Aranova, E., Baker, K. S., & Oreskes, N. (2010). Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957–Present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 40(2), 183–224. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2010.40.2.183

Ashley, M. (2000). Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/713664678

Aubusson, P., Panizzon, D., & Corrigan, D. (2016). Science Education Futures: “Great Potential. Could Do Better. Needs to Try Harder.” Res Sci Educ, 46, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9521-2

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.

Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and Nature. A necessary Unity. Cresskill, NJ.: Hampton Press.

Bauer, H. H. (2004). Science in the 21st Century: Knowledge Monopolies and Research Cartels. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 18(4), 643–660. Retrieved from https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/18/jse_18_4_bauer.pdf

Boeckel, J. Van. (2009). Arts-based environmental education and the ecological crisis: Between opening the senses and coping with psychic numbing. In B. Drillsma-Milgrom & L. Kirstinä (Eds.), Metamorphoses in children’s literature and culture. (pp. 145–164). Enostone. Retrieved from http://rane.falmouth.ac.uk/pdfs/jan_van_boeckel_arts_edu.pdf

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bortoft, H. (1996). The wholeness of nature : Goethe’s way toward a science of conscious participation in nature. Lindisfarne Press.

Bortoft, H. (2012). Taking Appearance Seriously. The Dynamic Way of Seeing in Goethe and European Thought. Edinburgh: Floris Books.

Carter, L. (2005). Globalisation and science education: Rethinking science education reforms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20066

Clark, W. C. (2007). Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(6), 1737–1738. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611291104

Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8059–8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100

Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: the emerging research program, 100(14), 8059–8061. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100

Colucci-gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C., Davies, R., Gray, D., & Trowsdale, J. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning : how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive , dynamic , and inclusive form of Acknowledgments.

Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The "Anthropocene" IGBP Newsleter, 41. Retrieved from http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/1376383088452/NL41.pdf

Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Oxford Book Company.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2006). Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 33(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781779154

Folke, C., Jansson, Å., Rockström, J., Olsson, P., Carpenter, S. R., Stuart Chapin, F., … Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio, 40(7), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y

Franses, P., & Wride, M. (2015). Goethean Pedagogy A case in innovative science education and implications for work based learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 5(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-06-2015-0037

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics, 10(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2

Gallagher, S., & Bower, M. (2014). Making enactivism even more embodied. Avant, V(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.12849/50202014.0109.0011

Geddes, P. (1902). Nature study and geographical education. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 18(10), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00369220208733394

Gibbs, W. W., & Fox, D. (1999). The False Crisis in Science Education. Scientific American, 281(4), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1099-86

Gilbert, J. (2016). Transforming Science Education for the Anthropocene—Is It Possible? Research in Science Education, 46(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9498-2

Goodwin, B. (1997). Complexity, Creativity, and Society. Soundings, Spring(5). Retrieved from http://banmarchive.org.uk/collections/soundings/05_111.pdf

Gray, D., & Colucci-Gray, L. (2014). Globalisation and the Anthropocene: The Reconfiguration of Science Education for a Sustainable Future. Sisyphus Journal of Education, 2(3), 14–31. Retrieved from http://revistas.rcaap.pt/sisyphus/article/download/6543/4983

Gray, D. S., & Sosu, E. M. (2018). Renaturing Science: The Role of Childhoodnature in Science for the Anthropocene. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research Handbook on Childhoodnature Assemblages of Childhood and Nature Research.

Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Association for Science Education. https://doi.org/978 0 86357 4 313

Harlen, W., Bell, D., Devés, R., Dyasi, H., Fernández, G., Garza, D., & Léna, P. (2015). Big Ideas of Science Education. Science Education Program, 1. https://doi.org/978 0 86357 4 313

Hawking, S. (2016). Transcript of Stephen Hawking’s second Reith lecture. UK. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/01_02_16_hawking_reith_lecture2_with_shukman.pdf

HCSTC. (2002). Science education from 14 to 19 (Third report of session 2001–02, Volume 1). London.

Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education INT. J. SCI. EDUC, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000076643

Hoffmann, N. (1998). The Unity of Science and Art: Goethean Phenomonology as a New Ecological Discipline. In D. Seamon & A. Zajonc (Eds.), Goethe’s Way of Science. A phenomenology of Nature (pp. 129–176). New York: State University of New York Press.

Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x

Ives, C. D., Giusti, M., Fischer, J., Abson, D. J., Klaniecki, K., Dorninger, C., … Solecki, W. D. (2017). Human–nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005

Joyner, M. J., & Pedersen, B. K. (2011). Ten questions about systems biology. The Journal of Physiology, 589(5), 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201509

Katagiri, F. (2003). Perspectives on Systems Biology Attacking Complex Problems with the Power of. Plant Physiology, 132(June), 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.021774.It

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., … Griibler, A. (2001). Sustainability Science. Reprinted from Science, 292(5517), 641–642.

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., … Svedin, U. (2000). Sustainability Science.

Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7156.html

Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the Century of the Environment : A New Social Contract for Science, 279(January), 491–497.

Lucadou, W. V. O. N., & Kornwachs, K. (1983). The Problem of Reducttonism from a System Theoretical Viewpoint, 2.

Maurer, B. A. (1999). Untangling ecological complexity : the macroscopic perspective. University of Chicago Press.

National Academy of Sciences Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington.

Naydler, J. (1996). Goethe on Science. An Anthology of Goethe’s scientific writings. Edinburgh: Floris Books.

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. a. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748

Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586840903194748

Puk, T. (2012). The influence of neurobiology on lifelong ecological literacy and ecological consciousness, 7(1), 3–18.

Raven, P. H. (2002). Science , Sustainability , and the Human Prospect. Science, 297, 954–958.

Raworth, K. (2012). A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Retrieved from www.oxfam.org/grow

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics : seven ways to think like a 21st century economist (First). London: Penguin Random House UK.

Regenmortel, M. H. V. Van. (2004). Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology. EMBO Reports, 5(11), 1016–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400284

Rockström, J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Hoskins, B., Ramanathan, V., Brasseur, G. P., Gaffney, O., … Lucht, W. (2016). Earth ’ s Future The world ’ s biggest gamble Earth ’ s Future. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000392.Received

Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, ??sa, Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., … Foley, J. A. (2009a). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009b). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a

Roszak, T., Gomes, M. E., & Kanner, A. D. (1995). Ecopsychology--restoring the earth, healing the mind. Sierra Club Books.

Saltelli, A., & Funtowicz, S. (2017). What is science’s crisis really about? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010

Scotland Policy Conferences. (2018). Next steps for STEM education and training in Scotland: widening participation, improving delivery and meeting the needs of business. Retrieved February 13, 2018, from http://www.scotlandpolicyconferences.co.uk/conference/STEM-Scotland-18

Seamon, D. (1998). Goethe, Nature and Phenomenology. In D. Seamon & A. Zajonc (Eds.), Goethe’s Way of Science. A phenomenology of Nature. New York: State University of New York Press.

Seamon, D. (2005). Goethe’s Way of Science as a Phenomenology of Nature. Janus Head, 8(1), 86–101.

Seamon, D., & Zajonc, A. (1998). Goethe’s Way of Science. A Phenomonolgy of Nature. (D. Seamon & A. Zajonc, Eds.). New York: State University of New York.

Solé, R. V., & Goodwin, B. C. (2000). Signs of life : how complexity pervades biology. Basic Books.

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockstrom, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sorlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855–1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

The Scottish Government. (2016). SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING & MATHEMATICS CONSULTATION ON A STRATEGY FOR EDUCATION & TRAINING.

UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet : creating sustainable futures for all. Retrieved from http://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco

Weinberg, A. M. (1961). Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States. Science, 134, 161–64.

World Bank Group. (2018). Urban population (% of total) | Data. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS

Zweers, W. (2000). Participating with nature : outline for an ecologization of our world view. International Books.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.