Editorial

Circular design in everyday urbanism: Towards regenerative and restorative dynamic spaces in cities


Abstract


Our habitats are being rapidly urbanised, renovated and restructured and, in this process, our cultural landscape is being radically altered. This unstoppable process of urbanisation across the globe has foremost implications for the environment, biodiversity, health and wellbeing of residents. The everyday city is a living laboratory that offers dynamic perceptions highlighting strands and synergies between senses, materials and spaces. This article reflects on the environmental effect of ecological design and circular economy on individual’s wellbeing at urban scale, so-called circular city. It deployed urban and ecological design principles to transform neglected spaces into healthy places through integrated grassroot experiments and models that empower local communities in innovative learning environments. For instance, urban greenspaces and community gardens are considered effective innovators in tackling problems associated with the deterioration of urban life such as waste, contamination and urban heat island effects. In the introduction section, this essay establishes a melted pot between the realms of urban planning, design and environmental psychology, particularly how human-caused problems such urban waste or vacant lands affect human health and wellbeing. The selected manuscripts for the special issue 11 of Visions for Sustainability titled “Wellbeing in Daily Built Environments” have emphasised the notion of wellbeing applied to design of the everyday city by interconnecting and balancing psychological, environmental, socio-spatial and cultural challenges. Projects, studies and materials presented in this selection propose a different way of thinking, playing and making our cities. They offer relevant literature and methodological supports from urban, architectural, aesthetics, perception and environmental psychology to inspire readers of this Journal to connect the states of the art in the fields of circular design and environmental psychology and also deepen on our understanding of processes and mechanisms underlying distinctive regenerative and restorative environments. It proposes a framework for understanding the dynamics of circular city, which can assist policy makers and planners to co-develop and design greenspaces with higher liveability and reuse or improve existing ones, ultimately humanising our urban environments and future replications.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/3390

References


Andersson, C. (2016) Public Space and the New Urban Agenda. The Journal of Public Space, Vol.1 (1), pp. 1-12

Chase, J., Crawford, M., John, K. (1999). Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press, pp. 88-109.

Crawford, M., Speaks, M. (2005). Everyday Urbanism. Michigan Debates on Urbanism Vol. 1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, pp.16-33.

European Commission (EC), Towards a Circular Economy: A zero Waste Programme for Europe (2014). retrieved in: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/circular-economy-communication.pdf

Fikfak, A., Suau, C. (2015) Urbanity in Motion. Beijing: Bentham Science Publishers, Open Urban Studies & Demography Journal, Volume 1, pp. 13-15. ISSN 2352-6319. DOI 10.2174/2352631901401010013: http://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/OUSDJ-1-13

Fuller, B. (1968) Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 121-139.

Lefebvre, H. (1973) Towards an Architecture of Enjoyment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 136-145

Lefebvre, H. (1974) La Production de l'Espace (The Production of the Space). Paris: Anthropos.

McDonough, W., Braungart, M. (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, pp. 92-117.

Mitchell, D. (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 118-160.

Papanek, V. (1971) Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. New York: Pantheon Books, pp. 3-27.

Secchi, B. (2013) La Città dei Ricchi e la Città dei Poveri. Laterza ed., pp. 4-80

Seyfang, C., Haxeltine, A. (2012) Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Sage journals. DOI: 10.1068/c10222

Seyfang, C., Smith, A. (2007) Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: Towards a New Research and Policy Agenda. Environmental Politics 16(4), pp. 584-603. DOI: 10.1080/09644010701419121

Shove, E., Surling, N. (2013) Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change. Oxon: Routedge. pp. 1-14.

Suau, C. (2015) The MOBILELAND© Garden: A Radical Landscape Game. Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning Journal 3, pp. 106-113.

Suau, C. (2017) Reactivating Urban Voids Through Sensory and Pop-Up Design: Changing Citizen Perceptions of Remaking with Waste. Aletta, F. & Xiao, J (eds.) Handbook of Research on Perception- Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design. Hershey: IGI Global publishing, Chapter 23, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3637-6.ch023

Suau, C. (2018) 3DFOGTECH©. Portable Fog Water Station for Water-stressed Environments. Hong Kong (China), PLEA 2018 Conference, Vol. 1 pp. 91-96: http://www.plea2018.org

Tjallingii, Sybrand P. (1995) Ecopolis: Strategies for Ecologically Sound Urban Development. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers

Zardini, M. (2005) Sense of the City: An Alternate Approach to Urbanism. Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture ed., pp. 208-239, 322-331.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.