Truth, Scholastic Transcendentals, and the Implications of Ideal-Realism
Abstract
The paper explores the possibility of philosophical cooperation between Thomism and American pragmatism by resurrecting a largely forgotten debate between Wilmon Henry Sheldon and Jacques Maritain. The discussion focuses primarily on the problem of truth as it is discussed by Peirce and by some contemporary Thomists, including Maritain but also Milbank, Pickstock, Lonergan, Balthasar, Pieper, and Ulrich. The paper claims that, if we bring Peirce’s version of pragmatism into the picture, cooperation is not possible but likely to be fruitful for both pragmatism and Thomism.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Aertsen Jan A., (2012), Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez, Leiden and Boston, Brill.
Alston William P., (1996), A Realist Conception of Truth, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
Anselm of Canterbury, (1998), Proslogion, in The Major Works (New York: Oxford University Press).
Aristotle, (2002), Nicomachean Ethics, Indianapolis, Hackett.
Ayer Alfred J., (1968), The Origins of Pragmatism, San Francisco, Freeman, Cooper.
Balthasar Hans Urs von, (2000), Theo-Logic: Theological Logical Theory. Volume I: Truth of the World, San Francisco, Ignatius Press.
Bigelow John, (1988), The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Boydston J.A., (1981-1990), The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, 17 vol. (= LW #: #), Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press.
Brandom Robert, (1994), “Unsuccessful Semantics,” Analysis 54 (3), 175-178.
Bridgman Percy W., (1927), The Logic of Modern Physics, New York: Macmillan.
Burke Tom, (1994), Dewey’s New Logic: A Reply to Russell, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
Colapietro Vincent, (2016), “Review of Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, edited by Gabriele Gava and Robert Stern,” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
De Tienne André, (2006), “Peirce’s Logic of Information,” Seminario del Grupo de Estudios Peirceanos, Universidad de Navarra, https://www.unav.es/gep/SeminariodeTienne.html.
Embry Brian, (2015), “Truth and Truthmaking in 17th-Century Scholasticism,” Dissertation, University of Toronto.
Gilson Étienne, (1952), Being and Some Philosophers, Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Hare Peter, (2015), “The American Philosophical Tradition as Progressively Enriched Naturalism” in Pragmatism with Purpose: Selected Writings of Peter Hare, eds. Joseph Palencik, Douglas R. Anderson, and Steven A. Miller, New York, Fordham University Press, 117-121.
Hartshorne C., Weiss P., and Burks A.W. (eds.), (1931-1958), The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. (= CP #.#), Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Horkheimer Max, (2004), Eclipse of Reason, London and New York, Continuum.
Houser Nathan and Christian Kloesel (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 1: 1867-1893 (= EP1: #), Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Legg Catherine, (2014), “Charles Peirce’s Limit Concept of Truth.” Philosophy Compass 9 (3): 204-13.
Lonergan Bernard, (1992), Insight: A Study of Human Understanding, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
Lovejoy Arthur O., (1908), “The Thirteen Pragmatisms. I,” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 5 (1), 5-12.
Lovejoy Arthur O., (1908), “The Thirteen Pragmatisms. II,” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 5 (2), 29-39.
Maddalena Giovanni, (2003), Istinto razionale. Studi sulla semiotica dell’ultimo Peirce, Torino, Trauben.
Maddalena Giovanni, (2017), “Review of Gava, Peirce’s Account of Purposefulness: A Kantian Perspective,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (3), 503-509.
Maritain Jacques, (1944), “Philosophical Co-Operation and Intellectual Justice,” The Modern Schoolman 22 (1), 1-15.
Maritain Jacques, (1952), The Range of Reason, New York, Charles Scribner’s Son.
McCarthy John C., (1993), “How Knowing the World Completes the World: A Note on Aquinas and Husserl,” in Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, vol. 67, 71-86.
McCool Gerald, (2009), The Neo-Thomists, Milwaukee, Marquette University Press. McDermott John J. (ed.), (1968), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition, New York, The Modern Library.
Mead George H., (1938), The Philosophy of the Act, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Milbank John and Pickstock Catherine, (2001), Truth in Aquinas, London and New York: Routledge.
Misak Cheryl J., (2004), Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, New York and Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Moore G.E., (1992), “William James’s ‘Pragmatism’,” in William James: Pragmatism in Focus, ed. Doris Olin, London and New York, Routledge, 161-195.
Pegis Anton C., (1967), “St. Thomas and the Unity of Man,” in Progress in Philosophy, ed. James A. McWilliams, S.J., Milwaukee, The Bruce Publishing Company.
Peirce Charles S., (1906), “Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism,” The Monist 16 (4), 492-546.
Pickstock Catherine, (2020), Aspects of Truth: A New Religious Metaphysics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pieper Josef, (2006), “What Does It Mean to Philosophize?”, in For the Love of Wisdom: Essays on the Nature of Philosophy, San Francisco, Ignatius Press.
Przywara Erich, (2014), Analogia Entis: Metaphysics: Original Structure and Universal Rhythm, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Ramos Alice M., (2012), Dynamic Transcendentals: Truth, Goodness, and Beauty from a Thomistic Perspective, Washington, D.C., Catholic University of America Press.
Rescher Nicholas, (1993), Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Rorty Richard, (1999), “Truth without Correspondence to Reality,” in Philosophy and Social Hope, London and New York, Penguin Books, 23-46.
Ross James F., (1988), “Eschatological Pragmatism,” in Philosophy and the Christian Faith, ed. Thomas V. Morris, Notre Dame, Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press, 279-300.
Ross James F., (2008), Thought and World: The Hidden Necessities, Notre Dame IN, University of Notre Dame Press.
Roth Robert J., (1998), Radical Pragmatism: An Alternative, New York, Fordham University Press. Roth Robert J., (1963), “How ‘Closed’ Is John Dewey’s Naturalism,” International Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1), 106-120.
Russell Bertrand, (1992), “William James’s Conception of Truth,” in William James: Pragmatism in Focus, 196-211.
Sellars Wilfrid S., “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.”
Sfendoni-Mentzou Demetra, (1991), “Toward a Potential-Pragmatic Account of Peirce’s Theory of Truth,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 27 (1), 27-77.
Sheldon Wilmon H, (1944a), “Can Philosophers Co-Operate?,” The Modern Schoolman 21, 71-82 Sheldon Wilmon H, (1944b), “Can Philosophers Co-Operate?,” The Modern Schoolman 22 (1944), 131-142.
Sheldon Wilmon H, (1944c), “Professor Maritain on Philosophical Co-Operation,” The Modern Schoolman 22 (2), 88-97.
Short Thomas L., (2007), Peirce’s Theory of Signs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Smith John E., (1978), Purpose and Thought: The Meaning of Pragmatism, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Stango Marco, (2015), “La logica del riconoscimento ontologico in Charles S. Peirce,” in M. Bonfantini, R. Fabbrichesi, S. Zingale (eds.), Su Peirce, Milano, Bompiani, 89-104.
Stango Marco, (2019), “Can Thomism and Pragmatism Cooperate?” International Philosophical Quarterly 59(4), 467-484.
The Peirce Edition Project, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, eds. vol. 2: 1893-1913 (= EP2: #), Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ulrich Ferdinand, (2018), Homo Abyssus: The Drama of the Question of Being, Washington, D.C., Humanum Academic Press.
West Cornel, (1989), The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Whyte J.T., (1990), “Success Semantics,” Analysis 50 (3), 149-157.
Filosofia applica una licenza Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License a tutto il materiale pubblicato.
