Main Article Content
The Blumenberg-Löwith “debate” over the secularization hypothesis is an evocative clash that continues to draw the attention of scholars interested in the history of ideas. On one side is Hans Blumenberg, who perceives modernity as justified on its own terms. On the other side is Karl Löwith, who does not recognize a substantive break between modernity and its epochal genetic precursors. At the heart of this debate is an impulse either to espouse or oppose the sovereignty of philosophical modernity in its relation to worldmaking. In this paper, I argue that Blumenberg’s thesis of “self-assertion” describes a re-establishing of the project of worldmaking in a sophisticated and nuanced language that is missed by Karl Löwith’s diagnosis of modern philosophy of history.
Keywords: Hans Blumenberg, Karl Löwith, Modernity, Myth, Worldmaking
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.